A few things to know:

  • We have kicked off a new research project that examines what’s working in publisher email strategies. Please take 10 minutes to fill out the survey.

  • Tell me what’s working. Send me an email with the subject “what’s working” about strategies and tactics. I will highlight some of these in upcoming issues. Email me at [email protected]

  • The TRB Media Mixer is coming to NYC on 3/19. We are giving priority to TRB Pro members. If you’re not yet a member and want to attend, fill out this form for one of the slots available to non-members and for invitations to future TRB gatherings in New York, as well as at Possible, Cannes and other locations. Upgrade to TRB Pro/Register your interest.

TIME’s newsletters reach millions of readers every week. But until recently, they were stuck with clunky workflows, limited insights, and flat engagement. After migrating 13 newsletters and millions of subscribers to beehiiv (with zero downtime) things changed fast. Open rates on “Inside TIME” jumped 63.8%. Click through rates across their portfolio increased to 11.7%. Editors now publish faster, with better tools and real-time insights. TIME proves that even the most established media brands can evolve and thrive when they own their email strategy.

Media’s new industrial logic

The media business has long had an industrial logic that’s underpinned it. The old industrial logic was built on scarcity. Media power derived from bottlenecks:

  • Broadcast spectrum was limited.

  • Cable channels were finite.

  • Printing presses were capital-intensive.

  • Distribution required infrastructure.

Paramount’s takeover of Warner Bros is premised on this kind of industrial logic. The deal will greatly consolidate a wide array of media assets under the control of Paramount. It’s in many ways the last gasps of a bygone era. That world is mostly gone since it is premised on scarcity and the gatekeeping role of studios. 

"In the old system, traditional media, the locus of power was with the studios,” said Darren Cross, a veteran of the streaming wars as a former Disney executive and author of No One Planned This: How Platforms Rewired Entertainment. “Scarcity always drives things. Scarcity determines power The studios had scarcity. They were the funds. They were the source of talent. They were the facilities. They earned the role of gatekeeper."

Industrial logic is the operating system of the mass-production era. It’s the logic of factories, distribution networks, standardized products, and economies of scale. It optimizes for throughput, uniformity and cost efficiency.

In a world of infinite content, a new industrial logic takes hold. Algorithms eliminate the mass-production logic underpinning the studio-dominated industrial logic. In a world of abundance. Hollywood, like all parts of the institutional media business, is losing badly to the rabble. Short-form video is probably making us dumber, but it is also very popular, sorted by algorithms and AI to fill any short-term attentional demand. 

The decentralization of media on its surface is a great democratization of the content industry. And it is, at least on the surface. Never before has there been access to such a diversity of content from a diversity of creators. Software developers are learning what happens when production logic implodes: leverage goes along with it. That doesn’t result in the flowering of a pre-industrial world of craft. Instead, a new structure emerges around platform logic.

"The platforms have a different idea,” Darren said. “They're not letting only a few select people in and placing big bets on them. They're letting everybody in, placing no bets on them, and then optimizing iteratively. They don't care who wins."

The logic of media was that it needed to make people feel something or promise to make them better: Richer, flatter abs, sexier, smarter. Now, media’s role is something else: to meet some sliver of attentional demand. This is why the clipper economy is thriving. It meets attentional demand cheaply and efficiently. 

The creator economy has no real “middle class” because it acts like a content casino. Massive tech platforms love creators. It’s far better to have millions of dependent suppliers than a few big ones who can negotiate preferred distribution and monetization terms. 

Creators are hardly sovereign. Platform logic dictates in large part what they create. In the content casino, any edge is quickly and widely dispersed. YouTube has become, in Darren’s words, “an emulation factor.” Authenticity became another optimization tactic. 

Mr. Beast is in some ways a source of inspiration but also a cautionary tale. He’s reached escape velocity by responding to the incentives of the YouTube system. The need to create “surprised guy” thumbnails is an obvious manifestation of platform logic, but so is pacing. Matt Damon pointed out that Netflix has changed the ways stories are told because tech has distracted viewers so much that they need to be reminded of the plot multiple times. 

There’s no crying in the content casino. 

Synthetic media, AI-assisted scripting, automated editing, AI voiceovers and generative video crater the cost of production. Anonymous Banker points to the success of the YouTube channel Bandar Apna Du, an Indian channel that features an AI-generated monkey in various scenarios. It has racked up billions of views for videos that cost very little to produce and are engineered around the platform logic of YouTube. They have no dialogue, no plot, no obvious point other than engagement. 

AI will strengthen the intermediaries. Recommendation engines become more personalized. Search becomes more conversational. Interfaces become predictive rather than reactive. The platform doesn’t just host content; it assembles it dynamically for each user.

In that world, the atomic unit of value shifts from packaged programs or articles to responses, summaries, and streams of micro-content. The platform decides which fragments to surface. The important part is people keep feeding the machine. The value in AI is on the orchestration layer.

Media will need to make a choice. You either operate within the new platform logic or seek exit through niches and returning to the roots of media in catering to a sense of belonging. 

"I think the answer is that people just go more analog,” Troy Young said in our last episode of People vs Algorithms. “You just go back to what worked before."

Reclaiming sovereignty

For years, publishers traded away parts of their independence. Distribution went to platforms. Monetization was outsourced. Strategy was shaped by intermediaries. It made sense in the traffic era, until it didn’t. Now, as search referrals drop and platform priorities shift, the fragility of those models is clear.

The TRB x HoK Audience Revenue Lab helps publishers build direct, durable relationships with audiences and grow sustainable, owned revenue models that don’t depend on platforms.

Platforms have replaced the open web as the free media layer. The compression of open-web publishing economics has made for a nightmare of paywalls and reg walls that are simply a bad product. Nobody can end up on a Variety website and find it a preferable experience to scrolling Instagram, where content is packaged better. On PvA, Troy had a hard assessment of the state of open web publishing

"The web is a joke now. It’s really sad. don't know if it was just sort of terminally fucked from the beginning because of the way it was conceived of, where it was a publishing system independent of a monetization system, where we ran advertising simultaneously with content. That never really worked. We basically auctioned off attention instead of having a more curated approach to advertising."

Thanks for reading. Send me a note with your feedback by hitting reply. For sponsorship and partnership information, email me at [email protected].

Keep Reading